Comic book Collecters and fans line up to comic conventions to see heroes, villians and popular shows, aquire autographed books, tantalizing and sexy cosplayers, wear outfits that are worthy of those pin up gals from the 50s and 60s.

But now the stories once loved by millions have apparently transmorgified into immoral and perverse incranations of their former back issues.

Introducing gay Batwoman, liberal Captain America, Smart Hulk, (professor hulk) and a barage of other insinuations into the stories that suggestively adhere to "the new generation".

----

Reboots of comics once considered as anthological have splotched the ennumeration system of collectors while introducing political agendas; rubber-stamp approving of sexually immoral behaviors that are scarring the face of these stories and the morals of the heroes...how far will these degenerative characters go into darkness and sin?

 The MCU has done it, and is doing it with the transition from phase 3 to phase 4 by injecting degenerative concepts into characters who would otherwise eshew the morality of the issue and therewith demoralize the story and heroism of the characters themselves.

For instance it came as a sucker punch to many Marvel fans to see The Incredible Hulk get his ass handed to him by Thanos.

Then in avengers endgame, a conflict arose when Bruce Banner was unable to change into the Hulk because the Hulk didn't want to come out and play ( this did happen in the comics) until five years had passed and then cowardly merged with Banner into the "Smart Hulk". (Professor Hulk).

 No rematch occured between the Hulk and Thanos, and no explanation was given.

In the comics Bruce Banner, had been killed at the hands of Hawkeye, when he and Bruce had a secret meeting. 

Banner had been experimenting wirh "Dead Gamma Cells" and got caught at the hands of several heroes, who caught wind of what he was up to and of course, showed up at Banner's doorstep to convince him to stop fking around.

Amedus Cho absorbed Banner's Hulkness, becoming the new "Incredible Hulk". But how this tied into why Banner asked Hawkeye to kill him when Banner's power to become the Hulk was previously absorbed by Amedeus Cho, and thereby makes absolutely no sense.

The Amedeus Cho Hulk series (first titled "totally awesome hulk") wound down fast as Marvel fans got irrate about killing off Bruce in the comics; for all intents and purposes Bruce Banner IS the Hulk.

Killing him off is like killing off Clark Kent and renaming Superman's alter ego as Emery Snodgrass.

Marvel did bring the Hulk and Bruce Banner back, but in a darker, more intelligent, twisted version of what he was, and now the Hulk is "apparently" Immortal, comes out only at night. 

Banner now goes through disgustingly gross transformations back and forth from the Hulk...it really is getting weirder...but it's also coming off the shelves faster than lickity split!

This however conflicts with the Marvel 616 timeline, because the Banner had a heart attack and died in Hulk: the end. Thus it would have to be a different incarnation.

Now in Thanos comics issue #17 an old Hulk, apparently from Hulk: "The End", is killed along with a Mjölnir
-weilding Silver Surfer by a future version of Thanos akin to the Future imperfect saga.

Unlike DC Comics, who gave everyone fair warning about coming changes to the DC universe continuity, with the 12 issue saga "crisis on infinite earths, Marvel gave noone any heads up to changes in it's continuity, by hinting at incarnations as we've seen with several MCU versions of Bruce Banner akin to Bruce Wayne in the DC Batman movies.

But it's not just Marvel Comics, DC Comics has also been tinkering with these selfsame concepts and literally have caused conflicting problems between it's own stories, the comic book origins with respect to TV and movie origins and introducing political and sexually immoral things into the movies and comics, that is absurd.

They are not sticking to the stories that make comics and heroes what they are today. 

Great heroes overcoming heinous  villians and sticking to moral values inherent to the characters themselves.

To alter the stories, and change them in such a way that they debase the fanbase and actually ruin the moral values of the characters, is to ruin the characters and stories which made them great.

Now little by little they are losing their popularity, because writers and editors are doing reboots, and intoducing all sorts of weird aniquations that eventually will lead to hanging themselves.

Such risk taking could in fact destroy the comic industry, it's a foolish and dangerous move.

...That's Just Not Comics, never was, and should not be!