Recent post
Archive for July 2021
What is an Assayers List?
An Assayers List is an unbiased list if things, people, places, industries, companies, shows, military, politicians, etc, etc that should be changed, eliminated, destroyed, put out, deported, rebooted, overhauled, redesigned, improved, refined etc that are not being done and bring with it or them evil, unessesarry suffering, prolonged exposure, incorrectness, financial immorality, lies, immorality, stagnation, imposed beliefs, falsification, and or require hard decisions against hard opposition unto the betterment of a culture, society, nation or world and universe.
This goes without saying that many of these items in the list may appear offensive, or seem inappropriate, wrong or downright anti immortal, it is with truth that if the list specifically answers to the downfall of or changing of one thing into or without the other then it is beneficial, mortally, and thereby benefits people of nations, tribes, cultures, and societies.
No defamation of character is to be intended in all such lists created by any person or groups of persons or to incite legal action by a third or fourth party.
Lastly, any item in the list is not to be used as a promotion for a specific agenda, i.e to meet at noon a the park and topple statues; for instance creating a list number to defame, slander, purpose of intent to cause bodily harm, do unlawful acts, hate crime, rediculous assertions, sandbagging, gaslighting and any insuations that indicate to a moderator that the item in the list is purely antisemitic or warrents removal or rewording.
For example: defaming a landlord by using his or her true name, and then posting thier image and then writing out how you will take your revenge on the property manager and owner after you were evicted because you trashed the place.
Do not make your item exhaustive and long.
Listing are enumerated and must be within context and must give validity to the reasoning behind the argument under the enumeration and it's statement.
--------------------
M.Cater:
1). FB needs to either be sued or to deal with their laziness concerning romance scammers on Instagram, and WhatsApp (and other social media platforms) and build a filtration system that will combat all scammers who's only concern is to rob people of their money online via false promises of love, courtship,companionship, marriage and the like instead of building algorithms designed to filter out bad words, pictures and videos THEY DEEM as inappropriate or offensive.
REASONINGS: Instagram is the no.#1 go to destination online for romance scammers, who pose either as celebrity, or other in order to pull on the heart strings of potentially ignorant lonely people seeking relationships internationally.
It is impossible to distinguish the image of the individual viewed by a user as opposed to the actual image of the person who's made the sock account...moreso their origin.
For all a user knows is that the picture of the person seen could be the actual person, or a Boris Johnson with a beard growing in and a cigar dangling from his lips in Panama creating the clever romance scam in letters and pictures to the interested party at the other end, who is seeking true love.
This is evil and wrong, and despite online warnings online, there must be a level of trust, otherwise it would not work. Finding someone becomes a neverending loop and difficult to locate an honest account.
The majority of the scammers reside in or near Nigeria; a good percentage of the Nigerians murder christians more than most places in the world.
While Instagram is not a dating site persay, it is a common areana whereby singles frequent to find a mate. However Instagram is a nest for romance scammers, and it is next to impossible to find one person who is honest.
Conclusion:
Building a filtration system to identify one's true location and and actual image of the person is necessary.
Banks:
The majority of banking intitutions, now, compared to the banks in the 70s are impertinent, and rude; starting an online account is biased and segregating. Especially for indigent individuals who are in fact united states citizens.
In some cases criteras are dictated to such degrees that eve transitional housing is rubber stamped as not legitimate through algorithms after online registration and all forms have honestly been filled out online.
Offline the situation retains the same levels of discriminatory rules that are decidedly and clearly disingenuous; as per their policies, which they deem appropriate according to boundaries established by immortal lawmakers who let the reigns of morality slip past into degredation.
While many so called banks used to be friendly, and respectful, the vast majority have turned on the public; now charging high fees, preposterous interest rates, and roadblocks, greed and unessesarry policies they deem as appropriate, when in reality they are wrong and not user friendly.
This goes without saying that there still exists banks and credit unions that are friendly...but ONLY if you have a legitimate address.
Addendums may transpire at the behest of the author.
Cheryl's motel and apartments in Reno Nevada.
2015.
The manager set me up, and yelled at me after he told me the night before to leave the door open to air out the upstairs, I did exactly what he said and he turned on me.
I said to myself, it not HIS money, thought he was lenient with tenants.
But he chose to raise rents, blamed it on the city council out if favor to his tenants.
Sold my collection and left for SF.
Lost a good $5,000.00 comics collection because of an a-hole landlord.
The next six years were homeless... again.
This time, was the last and Trump was in office, and I thought about how everyone is forced to pay rent... I think it's totally wrong and an uneccessary evil.
When the pandemic hit, I decided to stay outside, but had signed up for housing.
Finally got it as of 3 months ago after a year of waiting.
The thing is, is wasted time, which I won't be doing again.
I'm back and the next step will be... getting to a better position financially.
